SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF NATURAL RECREATIONAL RESOURCES CLASSIFICATION


Keywords: diversification of natural recreational resources, classification criteria, recreational nature use management, restrictions on forms and property rights.

Abstract

Topicality. The current state of socio-economic development demonstrates awareness of the need harmonious solving economic and environmental issues that arise as a result of recreational nature-use management; necessitates the search for scientific approaches to the classification of natural recreational resources, as well as the transformation and diversification of the recreational and tourist sphere functioning.
Aim and tasks. Aim: deepening and analysis of scientific approaches to the classification of natural recreational resources in the context of rational nature use and the recreational and tourist activities development. Tasks: to classify natural recreational resources on the grounds of exhaustibility, renewability, reproduction, setting restrictions on forms and property rights and their possible diversification in recreational and tourist activities.
Research results. The state of socio-economic and ecological interaction, the increase of society's needs in recreational resources and facilities cause the need for targeted use of natural resource capital to meet the needs of the population - in recreational nature-use management. Three functions of recreational nature-use management (social, economic and nature protection) are defined, their maintenance is opened. The distribution of environmental elements on natural resources and natural conditions, which is quite conditional, has been studied. According to the review and analysis of classification criteria and characteristics, approaches to classification are systematized, namely: physical-geographical aspect, economic effect, economic-legal, environmental and social factors. The classification of natural recreational resources is given in context of ownership relations and economic interests between the subjects of recreational and tourist sphere and from the possible diversification side of natural recreational resources use.
Conclusion. Thus, since the classification of natural recreational resources and conditions allows to identify patterns of different resources combination, determine the economic benefits of their use, opportunities for alternative, including recreational, use, as well as draw conclusions about the rational use, conservation and prospects of diversification, prospects for territory development priorities and communities located on them.

Author Biography

O.S. GOLIKOVA

Junior scientific researcher
Institute Of Market Problems And Economic&Ecological
Research of the National Academy Of Sciences Of Ukraine
Frantsuzskiy Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine

References

1. Beidyk O.O. (2001). Recreational and tourist resources of Ukraine: Methodology and methods of analysis, terminology, zoning. К.: Kyiv University.
2. Verkhoglyadova NI, Written OB. (2015). Classification of resources and its importance for resource management. Investments: practice and experience, № 16, 27-31.
3. Giletsky J.R. (2011). Classification of tourist and recreational resources by geosphere approach. Geography and Tourism, №14, 52-58.
4. Kravchenko N.O. (2007). Recreational economy of Polissya: current state and prospects of development. Nizhyn: MILANIK. Retrieved from: https://tourlib.net/books_ukr/kravchenko.htm
5. Mazury R.R. (2014). Recreational resources of the region as one of the main factors of formation and development of the territorial-recreational complex of the border administrative region and their classification. Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions, №2. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rekreatsiyni-resursi-regionu-yak-odin-z-osnovnih-chinnikiv-formuvannya-y-rozvitku-teritorialno-rekreatsiynogo-kompleksu-prikordonnoyi
6. Potishnyak O.M., Dudnik O.V., Kralya V.G. (2017). Recreational resources and natural-recreational potential as a necessary condition for the development of recreation. Bulletin of the Petro Vasylenko Kharkiv National Technical University of Agriculture. Economic Sciences Series, №182, 140-147. Retrieved from: http://journals.uran.ua/index.php/wissn021/article/view/126409
7. Rudenko V.P. (2009). Modern problems of ecological and economic assessment of natural resource potential of Ukraine. Geoinformatics, № 4, 38–42. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/geoinf_2009_4_6
8. Smal I.V. (2010). Tourist resources of the world. Nizhyn: Nizhyn State University named after Mykola Gogol.
9. Fomenko N.V. (2007). Recreational resources and balneology. K .: Center for Educational Literature.
10. Burkynskyi B.V., Martienko A.I., Khumarova N.I. etc. (2017). Institutional principles of the nature management’s administrative system development. Odessa: IPREED NASU.
11. Cherchyk L., Yerko I., Kolenda N., Mishchenko O. (2014). The current state of development of the tourist and recreational complex of the Volyn region. Lutsk: Lesia Ukrainka East European National University.
12. Cherchyk L. (2014). Scientific approaches to the classification of tourist and recreational resources. Nauk. Herald of Eastern Europe. nat. un-ty after Lesya Ukrainka: Series: Economic Sciences, № 3 (280), 149–159.
13. Shevchenko G.M. (2008). Organizational and economic mechanism of formation and use of natural and recreational potential of the territory. PhD thesis. Sumy: Sumy state university.
14. Hugo ML & Henning J.J. (1986). Classification and definition of outdoor recreational activities. Unpublished report. Potchefstroom, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education.
15. Wilson G. D. H., Steyn J. J. (1996). Classification As Analytical Tool For Recreation Planning. Town and Regional Planning, №40, 42-49.
16. Souza T. (2016). Recreation classification, tourism demand and economic impact analyzes of the federal protected areas of Brazil. Thesis for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of Florida.
17. Gjorgievski, M., Kozuharov, S., Nakovski D. (2013). Typology of recreational-tourism resources as an important element of the tourist offer. Special issue. UTMS Journal of Economics, 4 (1), 53–60.
18. Jordan J. (1976). Classification of outdoor recreation resources. Thesis for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of Michigan.
19. Ivlev, V.J., Ivleva, M. I., Panyukov, A. I., & Zulfugarzade, T. E. (2017). Analysis of the touristic recreational potential of a territory as a condition for the development of ecological tourism (the Southern Moscow Region Case Study). Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Volume VIII, Spring, 2 (18), 373-384. DOI: 10.14505 / jemt.v8.2 (18) .10.
20. Gaichenko V.A., Gudkov I.M. (2010). General nature management // Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, NTSh. Kyiv: Institute of Encyclopedic Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=15139
21. Vorobyova O.A., Dishlovyi I.M., Kharichkov S.K. (2009). Problems of nature management and sustainable development in the recreational and tourist sphere. Odessa: IPREED NAS of Ukraine,.
22. Shymova O.S., Sokolovsky N.K. (2005). Economics of nature management. M .: INFRA-M.
Published
2021-03-20
How to Cite
GOLIKOVA, O. (2021). SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF NATURAL RECREATIONAL RESOURCES CLASSIFICATION. Economic Innovations, 23(1(78), 41-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2021.23.1(78).41-50