INNOVATIVE MODELING OF THE ANTROPOECOSYSTEM IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0 CONDITIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE BLACK SEA ECONOMIC REGION


Keywords: inclusive economic development, innovative modeling, recreation and tourism, sustainability, Ukrainian Black Sea coast.

Abstract

Topicality. Despite the slowdown in socio-economic development, the escalation of armed conflicts, and the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on all spheres of society, the objective conditions of industrial and scientific-technical development of Industry 4.0 contribute to the acceleration of innovative development in Ukraine.
Aim and tasks. The purpose of the study is to substantiate aspects of innovative modeling of anthropoecosystem development, on the example of a comprehensive analysis of indicators of subjective assessment of the population of Ukraine and prospects for recreational and tourist development in the Black Sea economic region.
Research results. It is substantiated that in the anthropoecosystem the central element is the individual around whom the environment operates: as a result of the evolution of anthropocentrism in relation to the Industry 4.0 phase, Homo Economicus dominates, which due to the inclusive approach and state support forms a symbiosis with Homo Socialis. State regulation is aimed at establishing rules and incentives for innovation. The high level of economic development requires first of all the operation of the market regulation mechanism, which catalyzes the innovative development of the country. The combination and joint action of mechanisms of state, market and social regulation is a prerequisite for the formation of policies for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Conclusion. The article substantiates and generalizes aspects of innovative modeling of systems that have elements of economic, social and environmental development in Industry 4.0. Anthropoecosystem research is a response to the aggravation of the environment caused by a combination of socio-economic instability and the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the lives of the country, region and individual. The paper presents a comparative rating analysis of indicators of subjective assessment of the population of economic regions, in particular, the Black Sea economic region of Ukraine. Provisions on the development of recreation and tourism, the innovation of which is aimed at overcoming the effects of the coronavirus pandemic and Ukraine’s economic integration, are considered.

Author Biographies

N. I. KHUMAROVA

Dr. Econ. Sciences, Chief Researcher,
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Frantsuzskyi Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

M. M. PETRUSHENKO

Dr. Econ. Sciences, Head of Department,
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Frantsuzskyi Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

A. PROKOPIUK

Dr. Econ. Sciences, Professor, Rector
Bialystok School of Economics

Zwycięstwa 14/3, Białystok, Republic of Poland, 15-950

References

1. Preobrazhenskij, V. S., & Raikh, E. L. (1974). Problemy ekologii cheloveka I geografia [Problems of human ecology and geography]. Teoria i metodika geograficheskikh issledovanij ekologii cheloveka. Moscow: IG RAN, 12-22 [in Russian].
2. Sustainable development at the Black Sea (2019). European MSP Platform. Bucharest. Retrieved from: https://www.msp-platform.eu/events/sustainable-development-black-sea
3. Ibarra, D., Ganzarain, J., & Igatua, J. I. (2018). Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.002
4. Kalogeras, A. P., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2012). Innovation modelling: Understanding the fundamentals of the transformation of research to innovation. Proceedings of the 1st IFAC Conference on Embedded Systems, Computational Intelligence and Telematics in Control – CESCIT 2012. Wuerzburg, 182-187. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120403-3-DE-3010.00053
5. Tidd, J. (2006). A review of innovation models: Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30295.57762
6. Walrave, B., & Raven, R. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Research Policy, 45(9), 1833-1844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.011
7. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? : A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International journal of social ecology and sustainable development, 1(1), 41-69.
8. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D. & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
9. Burkynskyi, B. V., & Khumarova, N. I. (2011). Innovatsiynyi imperatyv stanovlennia „zelenoi“ ekonomiky [Innovation imperative of becoming „green“ economy]. Materialy VІІ mizhnarodnogo biznes forumu: Pryrodno-resursnyi potentsial zbalansovanogo (stalogo) rozvytku, Kyiv, 359-363 [in Ukrainian].
10. Burkynskyi, B., Khumarova, N., & Shevchenko, H. (2020). Deiaki aspekty derzhavnoho upravlinnia pryrodnymy aktyvamy v Ukrayni [Some aspects of state management of natural assets in Ukraine] Economical Innovations, 22(1(74), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.1(74).8-19 [in Ukrainian].
11. Khumarova, N. I. (2005). Ekologichni tsilovi programy u systemi derzhavnogo reguliuvannia pryrodokorystuvanniam [Environmental target programs in the system of state regulation of nature management]. Ekologizatsia ekonomiky yak instrument stalogo rozvytku v umovah konkurentnogo seredovyshcha. Lviv, 15, 187-194 [in Ukrainian].
12. Gryshchenko, V., Gryshchenko, I., & Ashkhab, H. H. (2018). Vplyv nesvoiechasnosti pryiniattia rishen u sferi upravlinnia natsionalnym hospodarstvom na ekonomiku Ukrainy [The impact of untimely decision-making in a field of national economy management on the economy of Ukraine]. Economy and Society, 17, 98-106. https://doi.org/32782/2524-0072/2018-17-14
13. Gryshchenko, V. F., Gryshchenko, I. V., & Samofalova, O. A. (2015). Security of entrepreneurship as a component of the national security of a state. Derzhavneupravlinnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvytok. 12. Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/12_2015/5.pdf [in Ukrainian].
14. Gryshchenko, I. (2012). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zahrozy ta nebezpeky v Ukraini: problem identyfikatsii ta protydii [Ecological and economic threats and dangers in Ukraine: problems of identification and counteraction]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 3, 47–51. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/3_2012/15.pdf [in Ukrainian].
15. Gryshchenko, I. (2012). Upravlinnia eksportno-importnym potentsialom rehionu z urakhuvanniam vymoh ekolohichnoi bezpeky yak factor harantuvannia staloho rozvytku [Management of export-import potential of the region taking into account the requirements of environmental safety as a factor in ensuring of sustainable development]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 1, 71-74.
16. Kyslyi, V. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Analiz peredumov formunannya rynku rekreatsiynykh posluh v Ukrayni [Analysis of the preconditions for the formation of recreational services market in Ukraine]. Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky, 2, 27-36 [in Ukrainian].
17. Kyslyi, V. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Rol ta mistse pryrodno-rekreatsiinoi sfery v systemi terytorialno-ekonomichnykh vidnosyn [The role and place of the natural-recreational sphere in the system of territorial-economic relations]. Ekolohichnyi menedzhment u zahalnii systemi upravlinnia. Sumy: SumDU, 31-34 [in Ukrainian].
18. Shevchenko H. M., & Ivanova T. E. (2015). Innovative-marketing directions of recreational-tourism industry in Ukraine // Economic processes management : International scientific e-journal, 3. Retrieved from: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/42355?mode=full
19. Shevchenko, H. M., Pakhomov, V. M., & Petrushenko, M. M. (2016). Economic and legal issues of rural and recreational land use in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(156), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0012
20. Shevchenko H. M. (2017). Prognozuvannja rozvytku rekreacii v Ukraine: socioal’no-ekonomichnyjy ejkvilibrium: monografija [Forecasting of recreation development in Ukraine: socioeconomic equilibrium: monograph]. Sumy : VTD “Universytetska knyha” [in Ukrainian].
21. Shevchenko, H. M. (2017). Regulatory policy and optimization of investment resource allocation in model of functioning recreation industry. Baltic journal of economic science, 3(1), 109-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-1-109-115
22. Zylman, B. (2017). Industry 4.0 and Beyond to 6.0. Retrieved from: https://www.bzylman.com/single-post/2016/05/08/Your-daily-dose-of-design
23. Petrushenko, М. М. (2020). Evolyutsia innovatsiynoy modeli Quintuple Helix na prykladi promyslovykh i pryrodnykh parkiv Ukrayny [Evolution of the innovative Quintuple Helix model on the example of industrial and natural parks of Ukraine]. Visnyk ekonomichnoy nauky Ukrayny, 1(38), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2020.1(38).109-115 [in Ukrainian].
24. Pro Tsili staloho rozvytku Ukrayny na period do 2030 roku [On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030] (2019). Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrayny vid 30.09.2019. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019 [in Ukrainian].
25. Loktyeva, I. I. (2016). Sotsialne vidtorhnennya u konteksti modeley sotsialnoho dobrobutu: mizhnarodne porivnyannya [Social rejection in the context of models of social welfare: an international comparison]. Ukraynskyy sotsium, 1(56), 19-27 [in Ukrainian].
26. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayny (2019). Dokhody ta umovy zhyttya [Income and living conditions]. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
27. Baturin, A., Bondar, M., Kovalchuk, G., Koroliova, E., & Kupnovitskaia, U. (2020). Reiting ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti regionov. Gde v Ukraine samyy chistyy vozdukh [Rating of ecological safety of regions. Where is the cleanest air in Ukraine?]. Fokus, 31.01.2020. Retrieved from: https://focus.ua/ukraine/449254-reiting_ekologicheskoi_bezopasnosti_regionov_gde_v_ukraine_samyi_ chistyi_vozdukh [in Russian].
28. Petrushenko, M., Shevchenko, H., Burkynskyi, B., & Khumarova, N. (2019). Game-theoretic model of investment in inclusive wellness and recreation by regions in Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(4.), 382-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.32.
29. Global Wellness Institute (2018). Global wellness tourism economy. 2018. Retrieved from: https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GWI_GlobalWellnessTourismEconomy Report.pdf.
30. Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichnyy mekhanizm formuvannya ta vukorystannya pryrodno-rekreatsiynoho potentsialu terytoriy [Organizational and economic mechanism of formation and use of natural and recreational potential of the territory: dis. … Cand. econ. Science], Sumy [in Ukrainian].
31. Balabanov, I. T., & Balabanov, A. I. (2002). Ekonomika turizma [Tourism Economics: textbook]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika [in Russian].
32. Kotler, F. (1999). Marketing Management. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter Kom.
33. Serebrennikov, I. V. (2000). Formirovanie organizatsionno-ekonomicheskogo mekanizma razvitia kurortno-turistskoy otrasli (na primere goroda-kurorta Sochi) [Formation of an organizational and economic mechanism for the development of the resort and tourism industry (on the example of the resort city of Sochi): author. dis. for a degree of Cand. econom. Sciences: spec. 08.00.05 “Economy and management”]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
34. Ekonomicheskiy potenzial administrativnykh i proizvodstvennykh system [Economic potential of administrative and production systems; ed. O. F. Balatsky] (2006). Sumy: ITD “Universitetskaia kniga” [in Russian].
35. Noriganova, О. А. (2003). Metodologia otsenki turisticheskoy uslugi kak rynochnoy kategorii [Methodology for assessing tourism services as a market category]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 2(13), 37-42 [in Russian].
36. World Happiness Report 2016 (2016). [Electronic resource] / [edit. by J. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. Sachs]. New York : Sustainable Development Solutions Network, I. Retrieved from: http://worldhappiness.report/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/03/HR-V1_web.pdf
37. Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (2014). Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 161, 29.5.2014, 3–2137. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A22014A0529%2801%29
38. European integration portal (2017). Turyzm [Tourism], 27.09.2017. Retrieved from: http://eu-ua.org/yevrointehratsiia/turyzm [in Ukrainian].
39. Strategy for the tourism and resorts development for the period up to 2026 (2017). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine №168-р, March 16, 2017. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/168-2017-%D1%80#Text
40. ISO (2020). COVID-19 response: freely available ISO standart. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/covid19
41. Crimea Development Program as a year-round national and international resort-recreational and tourist center (2003). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine №133, January 29, 2003. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/133-2003-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
Published
2020-09-20
How to Cite
KHUMAROVA, N. I., PETRUSHENKO, M. M., & PROKOPIUK, A. (2020). INNOVATIVE MODELING OF THE ANTROPOECOSYSTEM IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0 CONDITIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE BLACK SEA ECONOMIC REGION. Economic Innovations, 22(3(76), 137-149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.3(76).137-149