BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INCLUSIVE EXPERIENCE ECONOMY AND WELFARE ECONOMY (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ECO-RECREATIONAL SPHERE)


Keywords: recreation, experience economy, inclusive development, welfare, ecological factor, behavioral approach.

Abstract

Topicality. There is a necessity to study the behavior of recreants, implemented in the conceptual model of inclusive experience economy, taking into account the content and features of recreational needs as a basis for motivated behavior of recreants, combining ecological and psychological aspects of such behavior.
Aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to substantiate the relationship between the inclusive experience economy and the welfare economy based on the application of a behavioral approach on the example of eco-recreational sphere of activity.
Research results. In the article is substantiated that the experience economy in combination with an inclusive approach is a behavioral economics direction, in which emotions, experiences and impressions are not just factors influencing the behavior of the individual, but the object of economic-psychological research. A conceptual scheme for managing the behavior of recreants in the process of meeting the needs of recreation, experience, impressions, etc. is presented, which allows iterative analysis of certain scenarios and anticipate changes in the territorial-recreational system to optimize the relationship between recreants, recreational enterprises, government and the public. At the stage "investment", the optimization model, built on the basis of the proposed scheme, allows to determine investment-attractive recreational and tourist destinations.
Conclusion. In the paper the behavior in the recreational socio-economic sphere based on the application of ecopsychological approach, which allows to integrate aspects of ecologically oriented and eco-recreational activities in a single natural / recreational environment is substantiated, and a conceptual approach to managing economic behavior of recreants is developed, in the process of organizing and providing recreational services in order to form a set of sound management decisions to optimize the relationship between recreational actors, taking into account the factors of inclusive experience economy. The essential interrelationships between ecological and recreational needs have been improved, taking into account the criteria of primacy / secondariness; attitude to social, economic (material) and cultural needs; complexity – in the formation of the structure of welfare.

Author Biography

H.M. SHEVCHENKO

Dr. Econ. Sciences, Associate Professor
Senior Researcher
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Frantsuzskiy Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

References

1. Schmid, A. A. (2004). Conflict and cooperation. Institutional and behavioral economics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
2. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Vol. 1, Economic analysis and public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Gigerenzer, G., and Selten, R. (2001). Rethinking rationality. In G. Gigerenzerand R. Selten (eds.), Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1-12.
4. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
5. McGregor, J. A., Pouw, N. (2017). Towards an economics of well-being, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1123-1142, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew044.
6. Graafland, J. (2019). When does economic freedom promote well-being? On the moderating role of long-term orientation. Social Indicators Research, 149, 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02230-9.
7. Petrushenko, M. M., and Shevchenko, H. M. (2018). Regulation of ecologic-and-economical risks and the responsibility for human well-being: for example of waste management. Economic Innovations, 3(68), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.3(68).165-174.
8. Pine, B. J. II, Gilmore, J. (1998). Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 97-105. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy.
9. Harmon, J. (2018). Leisure Studies is for Experience, Not Industry. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education,33(2),47-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2018.1513272.
10. Lundberg, N. R. (2018). Experience Design in Leisure Studies, Parks, Recreation, and Tourism. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 33(2), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2018.1520487.
11. Burkinsky, B. V., Martyenko, A. I., & Khumarova, N. I. (2016). Instytutsiyni aspekty administruvannya sfery pryrodokorystuvannya v Ukrayni [Institutional aspects of administration of the sphere of natural resources use in Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrayny, 1, 72-83 [in Ukrainian].
12. Petrushenko, M. M. (2013). Prognozuvannja ta reguljuvannja rozvytku nacional’noji ekonomiki: sociopryrodni jy ekonomichni protyrichchja: monografija [Forecasting and regulation of the national economy development: socionatural and economical contradictions]. Sumy : VTD «Universytetska knyha» [in Ukrainian].
13. Petrushenko, M. M. (2011). Neobkhidnist i osoblyvosti zastosuvannya teorii ihor pry modelyuvanni pryrodno-resursnykh konfliktiv [Necessity and features of application of game theory in modeling of natural-resource conflicts]. Vistnyk SumDU. Serija “Ekonomika”, 3, 42-48 [in Ukrainian].
14. Shevchenko, H., Petrushenko, M., Burkynskyi, B., Khumarova, N., & Opanasiuk, Y. (2020). Management of wellness and recreation in urban agglomerations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(1), 231-241. https://doi:10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.20.
15. Kyslyi, V. M., Shevchenko H. M. (2007). Rol ta mistse pryrodno-rekreatsiinoi sfery v systemi terytorialno-ekonomichnyh vidnosyn [The role and place of the natural and recreational sphere in the system of territorial-economic relations]. Tezy VII naukovoi konferentsii: Ekologichnyi menedzhment u zagalnii systemi upravlinnia, Sumy, 31-34 [in Ukrainian].
16. Kalmyikov, A. A. (1999). Vvedenie v ekologicheskuyu psihologiyu. Kurs lektsiy [Introduction to environmental psychology. Lecture course]. Moscow: Publ. MNEPU [in Russian].
17. Skrebez, V. O. (1998). Ekolohichna psykholohiya [Environmental psychology]. Kyiv: MAUP [in Ukrainian].
18. Snakin, V. V. (2000). Ekologiya i ohrana prirodyi. Slovar-spravochnik; A. L. Yanshin (ed.) [Ecology and nature conservation. Reference dictionary]. Moscow: Academia [in Russian].
19. Antropov, V. A., and Pilichev, A. V. (2001). Sovremennyie problemyi upravleniya personalom predpriyatiy. [Modern problems of personnel management of enterprises]. Ekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN [in Russian].
20. Petrushenko, M. M. (2007). Ekonomichne obgruntuvannia motyvatsiinoho instrumentariiu ekolohooriientovanoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Economic substantiation of motivational tools of ecologically oriented management of the enterprise] / : Author’s ref. dis ... cand. econ. science: 08.00.06 [in Ukrainian].
21. Stadnytskyi, Yu. I. (1999). Ekonomichni osnovi upravlinnia ozdorovlenniam dovkillia (metodolohiia i praktyka) [Economic basis of environmental management (methodology and practice)]. Lviv: DU «Lvivska politekhnika» [in Ukrainian].
22. Nudelman, M. S. (1987). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie problemyi rekreatsionnogo prirodopolzovaniya [Socio-economic problems of recreational nature management]. Kiev: «Naukova dumka» [in Russian].
23. Dolishniy, M. I., Nudelman, M. S., Tkachenko, K. K., and oth. (1984). Karpatskiy rekreatsionnyiy kompleks: monografiya [Carpathian recreational complex: monograph]. Kiev: Naukova dumka [in Russian].
24. Bagrova, L. A., Bagrov, N. V., and Preobrazhenskiy, V. S. (1977). Rekreatsionnyie resursyi (podhodyi k analizu ponyatiya) [Recreational resources (approaches to the concept analysis)]. Izvestiya AN USSR. Seriya Geografiya, 2, 5-12 [in Russian].
25. Kotler, F. (1999). Marketing menedzhment [Marketing management]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter Kom [in Russian].
26. RBK-Ukraina (2019). Derzhstat rozkryv strukturu tovariv i posluh dlia rozrakhunku infliatsii [State Statistics revealed the structure of goods and services to calculate inflation], 11 Febr. Available at: https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/gosstat-raskryl-strukturu-tovarov-uslug-rascheta-1549878014.html [in Ukrainian].
27. Slovo i dilo. Analytical portal (2020). Vyno, korm dlia tvaryn ta kvity: porivniuiemo spozhyvchi koshyky v Ukraini, SShA ta krainakh Yevropy [Wine, food for tvaryn and quiti: tamely live cats in Ukraine, the United States and Europe]. 24 January. Available at: https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2020/01/24/infografika/suspilstvo/vyno-korm-tvaryn-ta-kvity-porivnyuyemo-spozhyvchi-koshyky-ukrayini-ssha-ta-krayinax-yevropy [in Ukrainian].
28. Finansovyiy portal Belarusi Myfin.by (2020). Minimalnyiy potrebitelskiy byudzhet [The minimum consumer budget]. 30 April. Available at: https://myfin.by/wiki/term/minimalnyj-potrebitelskij-byudzhet [in Russian].
29. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft (2017). Consumer price index (CPI): basket and weights. Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/prices/consumer-price-index.assetdetail.1962626.html.
Published
2020-06-20
How to Cite
SHEVCHENKO, H. (2020). BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INCLUSIVE EXPERIENCE ECONOMY AND WELFARE ECONOMY (ON THE EXAMPLE OF ECO-RECREATIONAL SPHERE). Economic Innovations, 22(2(75), 135-144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.2(75).135-144