STATE AS THE MAIN INSTITUTIONAL AND STRATEGIC SUBJECT OF ELABORATION AND IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE INNOVATIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT


Keywords: innovative development model, historically logical approach, protectionism, peripheral capitalism, market fundamentalism, strategic subject, sustainable development, economy management philosophy.

Abstract

Topicality. The effect of modern globalization processes leading to escalating competition make it actual and necessary to learn historical studies of implementing reforms worldwide and the role of the state in the process of institutional transformation provided by highly developed countries of the world. Therefore, the present day the key issue of Ukraine resolving which has the theoretical and practical importance is the issue of the institutional modernization with defining the role and placing of the state on course of implementing and supporting the innovative and sustainable development.

Aim and tasks: to prove, on the basis of learning the historical studies of implementing reforms worldwide and the role of the state in the process of institutional transformation, that at the present stage of human development it is the state that is in a role of the main institutional strategic subject of the innovative and sustainable development strategy that has the practical importance for defining the direction of the further social and economic transformation in Ukraine.
Research results. The article is focused on that the market system in its classical form is past the point of the historical development. Gradually, in view of objective reasons, the placing and functions of the state have been changing in the direction of consolidation of its role, direct dealing with resolving fateful issues. Nowadays in successful and developed countries it is the main institutional and strategic subject of mixed economic system, one of its organization components. The overview of historical experience of the reform implement in countries that have achieved substantial gains proves that these gains are connected with the institutional reformations with the state being in the heart of them. On the other hand, dogmatical proclamation of private property privileges under any circumstances and at the same time the removal of the state from resolving fateful issues, the glamorization of the market of Ukraine and as a result – system error while choosing and implementing the model of economic development, have led to the formation of oligarchic capitalism with the objective traits peculiar to it. Therefore, the present day the issue must be not the reforms modernization and intensification but the change of their rates, the economy management philosophy in general.

Conclusion. The research that had been made gave an opportunity to substantiate the attitude of the authors being that without the complex system support of the real sector of economy with the focus on innovation, without consolidation of state property and its institutes including those on the backs of reprivatizing the strategically important enterprises as the fundamental principle of the future economy of Ukraine the fateful issues would be impossible to resolve.

Author Biographies

A.M. VDOVICHENKO

e.s.c., docent of the economic theory and project management chair
The National Odessa Academy of Connections named for O.S. Popov
Kuznechna Street 1, Odesa city, 65029

O.V. KALINCHAK

e.s.c., docent of the economic theory and project management chair
The National Odessa Academy of Connections named for O.S. Popov
Kuznechna Street 1, Odesa city, 65029

M.A. KUZNETSOVA

e.s.c., docent of the economic theory and project management chair
The National Odessa Academy of Connections named for O.S. Popov
Kuznechna Street 1, Odesa city, 65029

References

1. Pylypenko O.V. Derzhavne upravlinnia innovatsiinistiu v Ukraini: problemy ta perspektyvy [Public Innovation Management in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects] / O.V. Pylypenko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2016. – №9. – S.31-43. [in Ukraine].
2. Kindzerskyi Yu.V. Deindustrializatsiia ta yii determinanty u sviti ta v Ukraini [Deindustrialization and its determinants in the world and in Ukraine] / Yu.V. Kindzerskyi // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 20167. – №11. – S.48-72. [in Ukraine].
3. Kolot A.M. Liudyna i nova ekonomika [Man and the new economy] / A.M. Kolot, O.I. Kravchuk // Ekonomichna teoriia. – 2015. – № 1. – S.5-25. [in Ukraine].
4. Eshchenko P.S. Reformuvannia instytutiv ta ekonomichnykh struktur – velinnia chasu [Reforming institutions and economic structures is the command of time] / P.S. Eshchenko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2015. – №6. – S.66-68. [in Ukraine].
5. Efimenko T.I. Aktualni problemy transformatsii ekonomichnykh teorii v umovakh hlobalnykh zmin [Actual problems of transformation of economic theories in the conditions of global changes] / T.I. Efimenko // Finansy Ukrainy. – 2013. – №5. – S.7-18. [in Ukraine].
6. Lahutin V.D. Stabilnist suspilnoho rozvytku: dosvid mizhdystsyplinarnoho doslidzhennia [Stability of social development: experience of interdisciplinary research] / V.D. Lahutin // Ekonomichna teoriia. – 2017. ‒ №2. – S.5-18. [in Ukraine].
7. Moskalenko O.M. Sotsialna oriientatsiia polityky ta mozhlyvosti vyperedzhalnoho ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Social policy orientation and opportunities for advanced economic development] / O.M. Moskalenko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2015. ‒ №6. – S. 82-91. [in Ukraine].
8. Eshchenko P.S. Ekonomichne zrostannia bez rozvytku: prychyny i shliakhy innovatsiinoho peretvorennia ekonomiky [Economic growth without development: causes and ways of innovative transformation of economy] / P.S. Eshchenko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2013. ‒ №10. – S.4-20. [in Ukraine].
9. Morozov O.F. Yaka natsionalna innovatsiina systema neobkhidna maibutnomu Ukrainy [What national innovation system is needed for Ukraine's future] / O.F. Morozov, Yu.V.Seniuk // Ekonomist. – 2018. ‒ №5. – S. 4-21. [in Ukraine].
10. Dymydenko R.A. Rol derzhavy u formuvanni konkurentnykh stratehii [The role of the state in the formation of competitive strategies] / R.A. Dymydenko, O.V. Lytvynova // Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Biznes. – 2018. ‒ № 3 (25). – S.65-72. [in Ukraine].
11. Heilbroner R. Ekonomika dlia vsikh [Economy for all] / R. Heilbroner, L. Tarou [pereklad z anhl. S.Artyshcheva, Y. Vilkhovoho, N. Hrynyka, V. Shtanka]. – Lviv: Prosvita, 1995. – 271s. [in Ukraine].
12. Stiglic Dzh. Cena neravenstva. Chem rassloenie obshhestva grozit nashemu budushhemu [The price of inequality. What stratification of society threatens our future] / Dzhozef Stiglic [per. s angl.]. – Moskva: JeKSMO, 2015. – 512s.[in Russian].
13. Zveriakov M.I. Teoretychna paradyhma staloho rozvytku ta ukrainski realii [Theoretical paradigm for sustainable development and Ukrainian realities] / M.I. Zveriakov // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2018. ‒ №10. – S.10-31. [in Ukraine].
14. Onyshchenko V.F. Sotsialnyi kontekst yevrointehratsiinoi stratehii Ukrainy [The social context of Ukraine's European integration strategy] / V.F. Onyshchenko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2008. ‒ №2. – S.60-74. [in Ukraine].
15. Krojter S.L. Ob jeffektivnyh i nejeffektivnyh sobstvennikah [About effective and inefficient owners] / S.L. Krojter // «2000». – 2016. – 4 marta. [in Russian].
16. Koval O. Na shliakhu do novoi industrializatsii [Towards a New Industrialization] / O.Koval // Dzerkalo tyzhnia. – 2018. - №4. – 3 liutoho. [in Ukraine].
17. Jekonomika perelomnogo momenta: lekcija [The Economics of a Tipping Point: Lecture] // Novoe vremja. – 2018. ‒ №39. – S.16-19. [in Russian].
18. Samujel'son P. Jekonomika, T.1 [Economy] / P. Samujel'son. – M.: NPO «ALGON» VNIISI, 1992. – 333s. [in Russian].
19. Jel'janov A.Ja. SShA na jetape dogonjajushhego razvitija [US catching up] / A.Ja. Jel'janov // MJe i MO. – 2012. ‒ №1. – S. 51-60. [in Russian].
20. Eshchenko P.S. Do innovatsii ta stratehichnykh priorytetiv obiednannia «nevydymoi» ta «vydymoi» ruky [Towards innovation and the strategic priorities of combining the "invisible" and "visible" hands] / P.S. Eshchenko// Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2016. ‒ №5. – S.3-16. [in Ukraine].
21. Heiets V.M. Instytutsiina obumovlenist innovatsiinykh protsesiv u promyslovomu rozvytku Ukrainy [Institutional conditionality of innovative processes in industrial development of Ukraine] / V.M. Heiets // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2014. ‒ №12. – S.4-19. [in Ukraine].
22. Bazylevych V.D. Instytutsiinyi kontsept modernizatsii finansovykh instytutiv [Institutional concept of modernization of financial institutions] / V.D. Bazylevych, V.L. Osetskyi // Finansy Ukrainy. – 2013. ‒ №5. – S.19-30. [in Ukraine].
23. Syzonenko V.O. Finansuvannia innovatsiino-oriientovanoi ekonomiky v umovakh instytutsionalnoi nevyznachenosti [Financing of an innovation-oriented economy in the context of institutional uncertainty] / V.O. Syzonenko // Finansy Ukrainy. – 2013. ‒ №5. – S.83-90. [in Ukraine].
24. Pavlovskyi M.A. Makroekonomika perekhidnoho periodu: ukrainskyi kontekst [Transition Macroeconomics: The Ukrainian Context] / M.A. Pavlovskyi. – K.:Tekhnika, 1999. – 336s. [in Ukraine].
25. Zveriakov M.I. Uroky rynkovoi transformatsii v Ukraini [Lessons of Market Transformation in Ukraine] / M.I. Zveriakov // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2016. ‒ №8. – S.7-25. [in Ukraine].
26. Kushlin V.M. Institucional'naja sreda innovacionnoj modernizacii [Institutional environment for innovative modernization] / V.M. Kushlin // Jekonomist. – 2011. ‒ №11. – S.65-81. [in Russian].
27. Nebrat V.V. Instytutsiinyi aspekt doslidzhennia ekonomichnoi istorii [Institutional aspect of economic history research] / V.V. Nebrat // Ekonomichna teoriia. – 2016. ‒ №4. – S. 87-99. [in Ukraine].
28. Zveriakov M.I. Odeska shkola ta suchasnist [Odessa School and Modernity] / M.I. Zveriakov, A.V. Hrymaliuk // Ekonomichna teoriia. – 2018. ‒ №2. – S.5-18. [in Ukraine].
29. Kornivska V.O. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku hlobalnoho ekonomiko-instytutsionalnoho prostoru [Current trends in the development of the global economic and institutional space] / V.O. Kornivska // Ekonomichna teoriia. – 2011. ‒ №3. – S.36-45. [in Ukraine].
30. Odotiuk I.V. Krok vpered i dva nazad – deklaratsii ta realnist derzhavnoi polityky rozvytku, innovatsii ta vysokotekhnolohichnoho vyrobnytstva [A Step Forward and Two Backward - Declarations and Reality of State Policy for Development, Innovation and High-Tech Production] / I.V. Odotiuk // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2018. ‒ №10. – S.127-141. [in Ukraine].
31. Lortikjan. Je.L. Istorija jekonomicheskih reform: mirovoj opyt vtoroj poloviny HІH-HH vv. [History of economic reforms: world experience of the second half of the 19th-20th centuries]/ Je.L.Lortikjan. – Har'kov: Koneum, 1999. – 228s. [in Russian].
32. Chernomorova T.V. Regional'naja innovacionnaja politika Velikobritanii [UK Regional Innovation Policy] / T.V. Chernomorova // MJe i MO. ‒ 2012. ‒ № 4. – S.93-104. [in Russian].
33. Seligmen B. Osnovnye techenija sovremennoj jekonomicheskoj mysli [The main trends of modern economic thought] / B. Selinmen [per. s angl.]. – M,: Progress, 1968. – 560s. [in Russian].
34. Kindzerskyi Yu.V. Derzhavne zamovlennia u sviti ta osoblyvosti yoho zastosuvannia u politytsi rozvytku: uroky dlia Ukrainy [State order in the world and features of its application in development policy: lessons for Ukraine] / Yu.V. Kindzerskyi // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2015. ‒ №3. – S.4-25. [in Ukraine].
35. Bondar I.S. Formuvannia derzhavnoi polityky v sferi innovatsiinoi diialnosti: navch.posibnyk [Formation of state policy in the sphere of innovative activity] / I.S. Bondar, V.H. Hornyk, Yu.I. Horban. – Kyiv: Lira, 2016. – 280s. [in Ukraine].
36. Zernetska O. Ukrainska naukova shkola hlobalistyky profesora O.Bilorusa [Ukrainian Scientific School of Global Studies, Professor O. Belorus] / O. Zernetska // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2009. ‒ №5. – S.85-89. [in Ukraine].
37. Samujel'son P. Jekonomika, T.ІІ [Economy]/ P. Samujel'son. – M.: NPO «ALGON» VNIISI, 1992. – 415s. [in Russian].
38. Fisun A. Yaponska model rozvytku ekonomiky [Japanese economic development model] / A. Fisun // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2009. ‒ №9. – S.26-43. [in Ukraine].
39. Vyshnevskyi V.P. Hlobalna industrializatsiia ta yii uroky dlia Ukrainy [Global industrialization and its lessons for Ukraine] / V.P.Vyshnevskyi // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2016. ‒ №8. – S.26-43. [in Ukraine].
40. Hzhehozh V. Dosvid Polshchi mozhe buty korysnym dlia Ukrainy [Poland's experience can be useful for Ukraine] / V. Hzhehozh, Kolodko // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2015. ‒ №6. – S.38-42. [in Ukraine].
41. Jekonomicheskaja teorija na poroge HHІ veka [Economic theory on the threshold of the twenty-first century] / pod red. Ju.M. Osipova, V.T. Puljaeva. – S.Pb.: TOOTK «Petropoljus», 1996. – 416s. [in Russian].
42. Tarasevych V.M. Pro derzhavno-kapitalistychnu obumovlenist innovatsiinoho rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky [On the state-capitalist conditionality of innovative development of the national economy] / V.M. Tarasevych // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2015. ‒ №11. – S.16-31. [in Ukraine].
43. Vyshnevskyi V.P. Hlobalna neoindustrializatsiia i yii uroky dlia Ukrainy [Global neo-industrialization and its lessons for Ukraine] / V.P. Vyshnevskyi // Ekonomika Ukrainy. – 2016. ‒ №8. – S.21-43. [in Ukraine].
44. Shumilin A.G. Nauka i innovacii – osnova jekonomicheskogo razvitija respubliki Belorus' [Science and innovation - the basis of the economic development of the Republic of Belarus] / A.G. Shumilin // Problemy upravlenija. – 2017. ‒ №3(65). – S.24-29. [in Russian].
Published
2019-12-20
How to Cite
VDOVICHENKO, A., KALINCHAK, O., & KUZNETSOVA, M. (2019). STATE AS THE MAIN INSTITUTIONAL AND STRATEGIC SUBJECT OF ELABORATION AND IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE INNOVATIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Economic Innovations, 21(4(73), 22-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2019.21.4(73).22-36