OPEN INNOVATION CONCEPT AS A PART OF INTEGRATION OF UKRAINE INTO EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA


  • O.E. RUBEL
  • A.A. ZHIKHAREVA
Keywords: Open innovation ecosystem, Servityzaton, Quadro-Helix model, Traypl-Helix model, innovative networks, culture of innovation, research infrastructure.

Abstract

Topicality. The integration of Ukraine into European Research Area (ERA) offers additional opportunities for the development of the national research system through the potential entry of new innovation and technology markets and facilitating the communication between Ukrainian scientists and researchers from EU countries. Priority 5 of the ERA roadmap contains tasks to improve the access to publications, open scientific data and knowledge, the introduction of state support for innovation activities and new procedures for the transfer of knowledge, protection and effective use intellectual property for the purpose of optimal exchange and transfer of scientific knowledge for the disclosure of the science potential and promoting the creation of a competitive economy. This indicates that the concept «Open Innovations" is the leading element of scientific innovation.
Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to study the innovative "conceptual space" and to create the methodological basis for the implementation of the modern international innovative conceptual apparatus "Open innovation" in the Ukrainian economic scientific discourse.
Research results. Discussion of significance each of the concepts defined in the article is important and perspective in scientific and methodological sense. The formation of innovative discourse takes place at the junction of many disciplines: technical, economic, linguistic, philosophical, and social. The practice of innovative activity will determine the most effective and demanded in the future. The paradigm Open Innovation 2.0 is based on the concept of Shared Values / Development Strategy and the Model of Innovations "Quadro Helix". The essence of this paradigm means that civil society joins with business, academia, and government sectors to drive changes far beyond the scope of what any one organization can do on their own.
Conclusions. The cultivation and organization of an innovative ecosystem with common innovation platform allows to combine competition, active user participation and innovation. It is crucial for the success of innovative activities.

Author Biographies

O.E. RUBEL

Dr.Sc. (Economics), SR
Institute Of Market Problems And Economic&Ecological Research of the
National Academy Of Sciences Of Ukraine
Frantsuzskiy Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine

A.A. ZHIKHAREVA

Postgraduate Student
Institute Of Market Problems And Economic&Ecological Research of the
National Academy Of Sciences Of Ukraine

Frantsuzskiy Boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine

References

1. European Commission (2008). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities // Available at: https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration.
2. European Commission (2015). Speech - [Check Against Delivery] Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World 22 June 2015 - Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15-5243_en.htm.
3. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge: Professor Andy Neely. (2014), abgerufen am 10. November 2014.
4. Lerch, Christian et al., (2014). Fraunhofer Institute for Systems & Innovation Research ISI: Service offers as competitive strategy in industrial firms. 12. Mai.
5. Michael, E. Porter (2011). Creating Sharing Value / Michael E. Porter, Mark R. Kramer. Harvard Business Review. – Vol. Jan.-Fab. Accepted: https://hbr.org/product/creating-shared-value-hbr-bestseller/R1101C-PDF-ENG.
6. Neely, Andy (2014). What is Servitization?. 30. November, abgerufen am 18. November 2014.
7. Martin, Curley (2014). Open Innovation 2.0: A New Paradigm./ Martin Curley, Bror Salmelin // Open Innovation Strategy and Policy Group. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=2182
8. Pisano And Verganti (2008). "Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/257285760/Pisano-and-Verganti.
9. Servitization of Business (2008). European Management Journal, 6 (4), – P. 314-324.
10. Cagri, Buluta, Hakan, Erenb, Duygu, Seckin, & Halac. (2013). Social Innovation and Psychometric Analysis // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences – Volume 82, 3 July, Pages 122-130.
11. The Advantages & Disadvantages of a Mixed Model Approach Available at: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-mixed-model-approach-31372.html.
12. Borras, Susana (2009). The Politics of the Lisbon Strategy: The Changing Role of the Commission. West European Politics.
13. User-Driven Innovation Context and Cases in the Nordic Region // Available at: http://nordicinnovation.org/Global/_Publications/Reports/2008/User-Driven%20Innovation%20-%20Context%20and%20Cases%20in%20the%20Nordic%20Region.pdf.
14. Wagner, M. (2003). The Porter Hypothesis Revisited. A Literatur Review of Theoretical Model and Empirical Test. Lüneburg: Centre for Sustainability Management, – p.2.
15. What is Servitization? (2013). Available at: http://andyneely.blogspot.com/2013/11/what-is-servitization.html.
16. What is user-driven innovation - and what is not (2009). Available at: http://helenevenge.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-is-user-driven-innovation-and-what.html.
17. Wikipedia contributors. Digital Single Market. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. January 24, 2018, 14:54 UTC. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_Single_Market&oldid=822124295. Accessed March 29, 2018.
18. Artyukhov A. (2016). Upravlinnya transferom tekhnolohiy v ramkakh modeli quadruple helix pry realizatsiyi innovatsiynykh proektiv rozvytku rehionu. Visnyk TNEU. 1, 42- 54. [in Ukrianian].
19. Belousova O. (2012). Korporativnoye predprinimatel'stvo: kak vdokhnut' zhizn' v ustoyavshiysya biznes. M.: NV «Klub direktorov po nauke i innovatsiyam», 83 s. [in Russian].
20. Vasina A. Yu.(2016). Instytutsiinyi analiz vplyvu derzhavy na strukturuvannia natsionalnoi ekonomiky [Institutional analysis of the state's influence on the structure of the national economy] Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky - The mechanism of regulation of the economy, 2, 60- 71 [in Ukrianian].
21. Zhykhareva A.A. (2016). Vprovadzhennia kontseptsii «Potriinoi spirali» yak suchasnoi naukovoi katehorii innovatsiinoi diialnosti [The introduction of "triple helix" concept as modern scientific innovation category ] Innovatsiinyi rozvytok ekonomiky: problemy ta perspektyvy,- Innovative development of the economy: problems and perspectives [in Ukrianian].
22. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom (n.d.). http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/984_011[in Ukrainian].
23. Zvernennia do Narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo intehratsii do YeDP (n.d.). // http://ung.in.ua Retrieved from //http://ung.in.ua/ua/news/113 [in Ukrainian].
24. Kravtsov, L.G.(2004). Metodologicheskie problemy psikhologicheskogo analiza myshleniya v ponyatiyakh [Methodological problems of psychological analysis of thinking in terms of] Proceeds from the First Russian Conference on Cognitive Science (pp 50-58). Kazan, Kazan State University [in Russian].
25. Yokhansson, F. (2008). Effekt Medichi: vozniknoveniye innovatsiy na styke idey, kontseptsiy i kul'tur / Frans Yokhansson. Williams. 192. [in Russian].
26. Chesbrough, G. (2007). Otkrytye innovatsii : sozdanie pribyl'nykh tekhnologii [Open innovation: Creating Profitable Technologies problems] ; (V. N. Egorova transl with Eng) Moskva : Pokolenie [in Russian]
27. Shadura, V.M. (2014). Tak de efektyvnisha nauka – v universytetakh chy v Akademii? [ So where is the most effective science at universities or in the Academy? ] Nauka Ukrainy v svitovomu informatsiinomu prostori - Science of Ukraine in the World Information Space, 9, 27-32 [in Ukrianian].
Published
2018-03-20
How to Cite
RUBEL, O., & ZHIKHAREVA, A. (2018). OPEN INNOVATION CONCEPT AS A PART OF INTEGRATION OF UKRAINE INTO EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA. Economic Innovations, 20(1(66), 162-173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.1(66).162-173