COMPREHENSIVE PROVISION OF TECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL GROWTH IN THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SECTOR OF UKRAINE


Keywords: productivity of entrepreneurial activity, technological potential, serial technological entrepreneurship, legislation, government regulation, organizational and institutional, financial and tax measures.

Abstract

Topicality. The problem of ensuring the growth of technological potential in the business sector of Ukraine arises due to the fact that today, in connection with the COVID19 pandemic, the problem of transitioning the economy to digital, "proactive" and remote mode, including optimization and standardization of provision processes public services, functions and services, as well as the introduction of new principles of their provision, focused on maximum convenience for business structures, their proactivity and multi-channel. Our previous research has shown that the technological gap between Ukraine and developed countries is widening every year, which requires the formation of an innovative model of high-tech development. This, in turn, requires stimulating the growth of technological potential in the business sector of Ukraine, as a basis for creating high-tech jobs and increasing the productivity of entrepreneurial activity.
Aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to develop a set of financial, tax and organizational-institutional measures to ensure technological capacity building in the business sector of Ukraine, which requires the following tasks: to explore current trends and identify major problems of business sector development in the context of technological capacity building. to ensure the growth of technological potential in the business sector of Ukraine.
Research results. A study of a number of regulations on the formation of an innovative model of high-tech development in the country, adopted by the Government recently, revealed a violation of the principle of complexity in their development. It is proved that the role of the so-called serial technological entrepreneurship will continue to grow, when a business project is considered as an object for development for further sale, ie to develop an idea, create a product, attract start-up investment, start sales, attract the next share of investment. growth of the project and in three-seven years to sell the company, and on the earned money to start the following business project. The development of this type of entrepreneurship will be facilitated by the fact that the Ukrainian venture market is increasingly integrated into the world market. But for this it is necessary to introduce new methods and tools of state regulation of such processes.
Conclusion. The article proves that despite the fact that the Government of Ukraine has recently adopted a number of regulations on the formation of an innovative model of high-tech development in the country, these regulations, despite their great need for the real economy (especially the National Economic Strategy until 2030), the same fundamental shortcoming as the previously adopted regulations, namely: the principle of complexity is violated, there are no real detailed measures, mechanisms and tools to stimulate economic development to increase its efficiency and productivity by increasing the level of manufacturability and innovation. A system of measures to ensure the growth of technological potential in the business sector of Ukraine, which consists of three groups: organizational and institutional, financial and tax, which take into account modern realities and needs of society, national economic system, institutional environment and global challenges facing Ukraine.

Author Biographies

B.V. BURKYNSKYI

Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Dr. Econ. Sciences, Professor

Director Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

Frantsuzkyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

O.I. LAIKO

Dr. Econ. Sciences, Professor
vice-director for scientific work
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Frantsuzkyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

N.L. SHLAFMAN

Dr. Econ. Sciences, senior researcher
Leading researcher
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Frantsuzkyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

V.F. GORYACHUK

Dr. Econ. Sciences, senior researcher
Senior researcher
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Frantsuzkyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

References

1. Polityka pidtrymky rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva v YeS. Supporting entrepreneurship. [EU business development support policy. Supporting entrepreneurship]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/supporting-entrepreneurship_en [in English].
2. Yevropeiska ramka pidpryiemnytskykh kompetentnostei. The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework (EntreComp) [European framework of entrepreneurial competencies. The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework (EntreComp)]. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1317&langId=en [in English].
3. Proiekt rozvytku i vidnovlennia pidpryiemnytstva v krainakh YeS ta krainakh-partnerakh. DANUBECHANCE2.0. Embracing failure to facilitate second-chance entrepreneurship in the Danube region [Entrepreneurship Development and Recovery Project in EU and Partner Countries. DANUBECHANCE2.0. Embracing failure to facilitate second-chance entrepreneurship in the Danube region]. Retrieved from: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/danubechance2-0 [in English].
4. Proiekt rozvytku sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva v krainakh YeS ta krainakh-partnerakh. FINANCE4SOCIALCHANGE. Leveraging Finance 4 positive Social Change [Entrepreneurship Development and Recovery Project in EU and Partner Countries. DANUBECHANCE2.0. Embracing failure to facilitate second-chance entrepreneurship in the Danube region]. Retrieved from: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/finance4socialchange [in English].
5. Bukrynskyj, B.V., Lajko, O.I., Shlafman, N.L. (2020). Strategichni napryamky pidvyshhennya produktyvnosti pidpryyemnyczkoyi diyalnosti v Ukrayini [Strategic directions of increasing the productivity of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine]. Instytut problem rynku ta ekonomiko-ekologichnyx doslidzhen NAN Ukrayiny. Ekonomichni innovaciyi: Zb. nauk. pracz. Odesa, Vyp. 4 (77). S. 7-18. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.4(77).7-18 [in Ukrainian].
6. Umanets, T.V., Shatalova, L.S. (2018). Innovatsiinyi potentsial tekhnolohichnoho pidpryiemnytstva rehioniv Ukrainy: teoretyko-metodychnyi ta praktychnyi aspekty [Іnnovative potential of technological entrepreneurship of the regions of Ukraine: theoretical-methodical and practical aspects]. Instytut problem rynku ta ekonomiko-ekologichnyx doslidzhen NAN Ukrayiny. Ekonomichni innovaciyi: Zb. nauk. pracz. Odesa, Vyp. 2 (67). S. 190-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.2(67).190-202 [in Ukrainian].
7. Butenko, A.I., Shlafman, N.L., Bondarenko, O.V. (2018). Metodychni pidkhody do formuvannia orhanizatsiinoho zabezpechennia efektyvnoho vykorystannia innovatsiinoho potentsialu tekhnolohichnoho pidpryiemnytstva [Methodical approaches to the formation of organizational support for the effective use of the innovative potential of technological entrepreneurship]. Instytut problem rynku ta ekonomiko-ekologichnyx doslidzhen NAN Ukrayiny. Ekonomichni innovaciyi: Zb. nauk. pracz. Odesa, Vyp 2 (67). С. 22-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.2(67).22-36 [in Ukrainian].
8. Shumpeter, Y. (1982). Teoryia эkonomycheskoho razvytyia (yssledovanye predprynymatelskoi prybыly, kapytala, kredyta, protsenta y tsykla konъiunkturы) [Theory of economic development (study of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and business cycle)]. M.: Prohress [in Russian].
9. McMillan, J. (2002) The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Т. 16. [in English].
10. Bailetti, T. (2012) Technology Entrepreneurship: Overview, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review. February [in English].
11. Helmut Gassler, Wolfgang Plot, Julia Schindler, Matthias Weber, Sami Mahroum, Klaus Kubeczko et al. (2004). Priorities in science & technology policy an international comparison / Commissioned by the Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development. Project Nr. RTW.2003.AF.014-01 [in English].
12. Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook - 2016. Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en [in English].
13. Liashenko, V.I., Liashenko, A.Iu. (2019). Spetsialni rezhymy hospodariuvannia yak instrument vyrivniuvannia umov konkurentsii ta pryskorennia innovatsiinoho rozvytku [Special management regimes as a tool to level the playing field and accelerate innovation development]. Upravlinnia ekonomikoiu: teoriia ta praktyka. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37405/2221-1187.2019.23-49 [in Ukrainian].
14. Kuzhel, O. (2019). Stratehichni napriamy ta zakhody reformuvannia ekonomichnoi polityky Ukrainy [Strategic directions and measures for reforming ukraine’s economic policy]. Instytut problem rynku ta ekonomiko-ekologichnyx doslidzhen NAN Ukrayiny. Economic Innovations, Zb. nauk. pracz. Odesa, Vyp 4 (73), 76-84. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2019.21.4(73).76-84 [in Ukrainian].
15. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy «Pro zatverdzhennia Natsionalnoi ekonomichnoi stratehii na period do 2030 roku» [Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On approval of the National Economic Strategy for the period up to 2030"] vid 03.03.2021 r. № 179. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennya-nacionalnoyi-eko-a179 [in Ukrainian].
16. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Natsionalnoi ekonomichnoi stratehii na period do 2030 roku». [Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On Amendments to the National Economic Strategy until 2030"] vid 10.03.2021 r. № 202. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/202-2021-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
17. Proiekt Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro derzhavnu promyslovu polityku» [Draft Law of Ukraine "On State Industrial Policy"]. Retrieved from: http://www.drs.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/dokument-3289_1_19-21.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Stratehiia rozvytku finansovoho sektoru Ukrainy do 2025 roku [Strategy for the development of the financial sector of Ukraine until 2025]. Retrieved from: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/about/develop-strategy [in Ukrainian].
19. Pandemyia y venchurnыe ynvestytsyy: cheho ozhydat v 2021 hodu? [Pandemic and venture capital: what to expect in 2021?]. Retrieved from: https://inventure.com.ua/analytics/articles/pandemiya-i-venchurnye-investicii:-chego-ozhidat-v-2021-godu [in Ukrainian].
20. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro zahalni zasady stvorennia i funktsionuvannia spetsialnykh (vilnykh) ekonomichnykh zon» [Law of Ukraine "On General Principles of Creation and Functioning of Special (Free) Economic Zones"]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2673-12#top [in Ukrainian].
Published
2021-08-20
How to Cite
BURKYNSKYI, B., LAIKO, O., SHLAFMAN, N., & GORYACHUK, V. (2021). COMPREHENSIVE PROVISION OF TECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL GROWTH IN THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SECTOR OF UKRAINE. Economic Innovations, 23(3(80), 11-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2021.23.3(80).11-20