METHODOLOGY FOR THE FORMATION OF INDICATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DECISIONS IN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES


Keywords: efficiency, strategic decisions, methodology, industrial enterprises, performance indicators, strategic ideas.

Abstract

Topicality. Industry, as one of the components of the national economy of any country, plays one of the leading roles in it due to the fact that it is industry that creates a large part of the GDP. In addition, the leading role of industry lies in the fact that the degree of satisfaction of society's needs for high-quality products, ensuring the technical re-equipment of production and its intensification depends on its success. Formed difficult financial and economic conditions in the country's economy have not yet made it possible to achieve significant changes in the direction of stabilizing industrial production, improving the sectoral structure and its social orientation. For the production of various forms of ownership, functioning in market conditions, it is essential, on the one hand, to develop principles and norms of strategic management, and on the other, to their practical use in order to increase the efficiency of industrial production. It is the isolation of these problems that made it possible to determine the direction of research on the methodology for the formation of indicators of the effectiveness of management decisions at industrial enterprises.
Aim and tasks. The aim of the work is to develop and substantiate a methodology for indicators of the effectiveness of management decisions at industrial enterprises. Achievement of the set research goal led to the formation and resolution of the following tasks: to study the system of main indicators of the enterprise's performance; to form a methodological basis for management decisions.
Research results. The work developed and substantiated a system of main indicators of the enterprise's performance, which provides for the calculation of the following profitability indicators: production, sales, assets, equity, production assets, personnel, invested capital, etc. It has been established that efficiency is the sum of two factors: the difference between results and costs, which indicates a positive balance (i.e., the benefits that are brought by human efforts), and the ability of this difference to meet the real vital needs of society (people). It is shown that the sources of strategic ideas in centralized decision-making are a high level of management (top management) due to the fact that it is there that information is concentrated, as well as central services and heads of production departments.
Conclusion. The obtained results of the study make it possible to systematize the information obtained by calculating the indicators of the efficiency of enterprises and to formalize the process of making managerial decisions; to improve the scientific support of the process of implementation of strategic changes at the enterprise by using the four-stage model of "gradual (evolutionary) growth of changes".

Author Biographies

O.B. KALAMAN

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Logistics,
Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
Kanatnaya street, 112, s. Odesa, Ukraine, 65039

V. SKRIBANS

Dr. Sc. (Economics), Associate Professor, Senior Research
Riga Technical University
6 Kalnciema str. Riga LV-1658 Latvia

D.V. MANDRYKIN

Applicant for the Department of Management and Logistics,
Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies
st. Kanatnaya, 112, s. Odesa, Ukraine, 65039

References

1. Chorna, M. V., & Diadin, A. S. (2017). Efektyvnist pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti subiektiv hospodariuvannia v rozdribnii torhivli v konkurentnomu seredovyshchi [Efficiency of acceptance of government subordinates in the development of trade in a competitive environment]. Aktualni problemy ta napriamy rozvytku potentsialu sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system v umovakh konkurentsii – Actual problems that directly develop the potential of social and economic systems in the minds of competition (рр. 154–159). Kharkiv: FOP Panov A. M., Vydav. TOV «V spravi» [in Ukrainian].
2. Shcherban, O. D., & Konoval, A. V. (2018). Mekhanizm formuvannia finansovykh resursiv pidpryiemstv [Mechanism of forming financial resources of enterprises]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo– Economy and suspension, 16, 554–559. [in Ukrainian].
3. Novikova, M. M. (Ed.) (2018). Marketynhovi doslidzhennia staloho rozvytku v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv [Marketing to the latest development in the minds of global victories]. Kharkiv : Vydavnytstvo “Tochka” [in Ukrainian].
4. Savytska, O. M., & Salabai, V. O. (2019). Efektyvnist diialnosti ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: osoblyvosti vykorystannia teorii, metodolohii ta rezultatyvnosti analitychnykh doslidzhen [Effectiveness and management of the enterprise: special features of the theory, methodology and effectiveness of analytical messages]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Economics is effective, 6. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.6.55. [in Ukrainian].
5. Shvydanenko, H. O., & Boichenko, K. S. (2015). Rozvytok pidpryiemstva: stratehichni namiry, ryzyky ta efektyvnist [Development of the enterprise: strategic namiri, riziki and efficiency]. Kiev: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
6. Poplavska, Zh. V., Mykhalchyshyn, N. L., Danylovych-Kropyvnytska, M. L., Hoshovska, O. V., & Komarynets, S. O. (2019). Suchasni formy konkurentnoi vzaiemodii subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Modern forms of competitive interaction of business entities]. Lviv: TOV “Galitska vidavnycha spilka” [in Ukrainian].
7. Kalaman, O. B. (2020). Upravlinnia stratehiieiu rozvytku vynorobnykh pidpryiemstv [Management of strategic development of wineries]. Odesa: Drukarskyi dim, Druk Pivden [in Ukrainian].
8. Kalaman, O. B. (2019). Upravlinnia stratehichnym rozvytkom suchasnykh vynorobnykh pidpryiemstv: teoretychnyi aspekt [Management of strategic development of wineries: theoretical aspect]. Mekhanizm upravlinnia formuvanniam stratehii vyperedzhaiuchoho innovatsiinoho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv – Mechanism of managing the formulation of strategies for the forward-looking innovation development of industrial enterprises (pp. 156–169). Sumy: Trytoriia [in Ukrainian].
9. Layko, O. I., Umanets', T. V., Shlafman, N. L. (2021). Stratehichni napryamky zdiysnennya podatkovoho rehulyuvannya ekonomichnoho rozvytku v umovakh reform [Strategic direct development of tax regulation of economic development in the minds of reforms]. Ekonomichni innovatsiyi, 23, 1 (78), 115-125[in Ukrainian].
10. Burkyns'kyy, B. V., Layko, O. I., Shlafman, N. L. (2020). Stratehichni napryamky pidvyshchennya produktyvnosti pidpryyemnyts'koyi diyal'nosti v Ukrayini [Strategic directly to improve the productivity of industrial activity in Ukraine]. Ekonomichni innovatsiyi, 22, 4 (77), 7-18 [in Ukrainian].
11. Masliy, N. D. (2018). Intehratsiyni formy rozvytku pidpryyemstv: teoretychni aspekty ta praktychni pidkhody [Integration form development of enterprises: theoretical aspects and practical approaches]. Odesa: Odes'kyy natsional'nyy universytet imeni I. I. Mechnykova [in Ukrainian].
12. Masliy, N. D. (2013). Metodolohichni osnovy stvorennya klasteriv v haluzi zv"yazku [Methodological bases of cluster formation in the hallucination]. Innovatsiyna ekonomika, 4 [42], 67–70 [in Ukrainian].
13. Bezpartochnyy, M. H. (2014). Vykorystannya klasternoho analizu pry otsintsi efektyvnosti diyal'nosti torhovel'nykh pidpryyemstv [Vikoristannya cluster analysis in the assessment of the efficiency of trade enterprises]. Torhivlya, komertsiya, pidpryyemnytstvo, 17, 24–27 [in Ukrainian].
Published
2021-06-20
How to Cite
KALAMAN, O., SKRIBANS, V., & MANDRYKIN, D. (2021). METHODOLOGY FOR THE FORMATION OF INDICATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DECISIONS IN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. Economic Innovations, 23(2(79), 87-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2021.23.2(79).87-95