Keywords: experience economy, recreational nature management, health, well-being, inclusive approach.


Topicality. At the practical level of economic support for social and environmental policies of the state, there is a need to combine the approach of the experience industry with the accessibility and involvement of as many people and businesses as possible in this service industry, above all, in the field of wellness and recreation.
Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate the factors of wellness and recreation that meet the concepts of sustainable inclusive development and experience economy in recreational nature management.
Research results. The inclusive experience economy is defined as a system of social relations in which for the maximum number of agents their economic opportunities related to experience (impressions, emotions, feelings, memories) are maximized as a specific especially valuable (in psycho-emotional, aesthetic and other sense) service. The development of the inclusive experience economy is conceptualized in recreational nature management based on behavioral, environmental, socio-natural, eco-friendly and social-market approaches, in order to regulate ecological and economic relations in the conditions of transformation of extractive economic as well as political and social institutions into inclusive ones for ensuring human well-being.
Conclusion. The methodological approach to substantiation of the essential component of well-being is proposed, which is mediated by the contradiction of “experience / impression – inclusion” and allows, subject to systematic state support and environmental quality assurance, to create a basis for attracting long-term investment in those economic sectors whose impact on well-being is, above all, wellness and recreational. Methodological principles of environmental research are improved, namely: the principle of genetic unity (inclusiveness) of nature and society, the principle of indirectness (comprehensiveness) of the role of social production in the interconnection “society – nature”, the principle of reproduction (responsibility) of nature.

Author Biography


Dr. Econ. Sciences
Head of Department,
Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Frantsuzskiy Boulevard, 29,
Odesa, Ukraine, 65044


1. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2017). On approval of the Tourism and Resort Development Strategy for the period up to 2026 (№168-р. 16.03.2017). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/249826501.
2. Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (2014). National Strategy for Healthcare Reform in Ukraine for the period 2015-2020. Retrieved from https://moz.gov.ua/uploads/0/691-strategiya.pdf.
3. Schulze, G. (1993). Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. New York: Campus Verlag. 765 p.
4. Pine, B. J. II, & Gilmore, J. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 97-105. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy.
5. Chang, S. (2018). Experience economy in hospitality and tourism: Gain and loss values for service and experience. Tourism Management, 64(C), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.08.004.
6. Hutter, M. (2018) The role of newness in the experience economy. In: Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H., Hutter, M. (eds.) Innovation Society Today. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 149-164 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19269-3_7.
7. Maslova, M. (2017). Revisiting tourism experience in the experience economy: Sociological and psychological perspectives. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3061439.
8. Quadri-Felitti, D., & Fiore, A. M. (2012). Experience economy constructs as a framework for understanding wine tourism. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(1), 3–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356766711432222.
9. Stasiak, A. (2013). New spaces and forms of tourism in experience economy. Turyzm, 23(2), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.2478/tour-2013-0012.
10. Yeoman, I., & McMahon-Beattie, U. (2019). The experience economy: Micro trends. Journal of Tourism Futures, 5(2), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-05-2019-0042.
11. Burkinskiy, B. V., Stepanov, V. M., & Kharichkov, S. K. (2005) Ekonomiko-ekologicheskie osnovy regionalnogo prirodopolzovanija i razvitija [Economic and environmental foundations of regional nature management and development]. Odessa: Feniks [in Russian].
12. Dryzek, J. S. (1996). Foundations for environmental political economy: The search for homo ecologicus? New Political Economy, 1(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469608406236.
13. Petrushenko, M. M. (2013). Prognozuvannja ta reguljuvannja rozvytku nacional’noji ekonomiki: sociopryrodni jy ekonomichni protyrichchja: monografija [Forecasting and regulation of the national economy development: socionatural and economical contradictions]. Sumy : VTD “Universytetska knyha” [in Ukrainian].
14. Kovalyova, N. G., & Khumarova, N. I. (1998). Funktsii khozyaystvennogo kontrolya, ekologicheskogo audita I ekspertizy v formirovanii rynochnykh otnosheniy [The functions of economic control, environmental audit and examination in the formation of market relations]. Prirodookhrannoe regulirovanie v rynochnykh otnosheniakh. Odessa, 184-194 [in Russian].
15. Kyslyi, V. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Analiz peredumov formunannya rynku rekreatsiynykh posluh v Ukrayni [Analysis of the preconditions for the formation of recreational services market in Ukraine]. Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky. 2, 27-36 [in Ukrainian].
16. Kyslyi, V. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Rol ta mistse pryrodno-rekreatsiinoi sfery v systemi terytorialno-ekonomichnykh vidnosyn [The role and place of the natural-recreational sphere in the system of territorial-economic relations]. Ekolohichnyi menedzhment u zahalnii systemi upravlinnia. Sumy: SumDU, 31-34 [in Ukrainian].
17. Shevchenko, H. M., Pakhomov, V. M., & Petrushenko, M. M. (2016). Economic and legal issues of rural and recreational land use in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(156), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0012.
18. Cherchyk, L. M. (2008). Evaluation of current state and prospects for recreational nature management development in Ukraine. Actual Problems of Economics, 6, 180-186.
19. Shevchenko, H. M. (2017). Prognozuvannja rozvytku rekreacii v Ukraine: socioalno-ekonomichnyy ekvilibrium: monografiya [Forecasting of recreation development in Ukraine: socioeconomic equilibrium: monograph]. Sumy : VTD “Universytetska knyha” [in Ukrainian].
20. Martienko, A., & Khumarova, N. (2017). Improvement of the administration system in the field of natural resources use. Economics. Ecology. Socium. 1(1), 71-81.
21. Petrushenko M. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2018). Regulation of ecologic-and-economical risks and the responsibility for human well-being: for example of waste management. Economic Innovations. 3(68), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.3(68).165-174.
22. Prokopenko, O. V., Kysly, V. M., & Shevchenko, H. M. (2014). Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions. Economic Annals-XXI. 7–8(1), 40-43.
23. Khumarova, N. I. (2005). Ekolohichni tsilyovi prohramy u systemi derzhavnoho rehulyuvannia pryrodokorystuvannia [Environmental target programs in the system of state regulation of nature management]. Ekolohizatsia ekonomiky yak instrument staloho rozvytku v umovakh konkurentnoho seredovyshcha. 15.6, 187-194 [in Ukrainian].
24. Shevchenko, H. M. (2017). Regulatory policy and optimization of investment resource allocation in model of functioning recreation industry. Baltic journal of economic science, 3(1), 109-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-1-109-115.
25. Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements. 16, 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z.
26. United Nations (2016). Global Sustainable Development Report 2016, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, July. 134 p.
27. Volkmann, U. (2007). Das Projekt des schцnen Lebens – Gerhard Schulzes „Erlebnisgesellschaft“. Soziologische Gegenwartsdiagnosen I. VS Verlag fьr Sozialwissenschaften. 75-89.
28. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2017). Ukraine households self-perceived of their income. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
29. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2018). Population’s self-perceived of health status and availability of selected types of medical aid. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
30. Kyiv International Economic Forum. (2017). Inclusiveness of Economy – a new measure of economic growth. Retrieved from https://forumkyiv.org/uk/news/inkljuzivnist-ekonomiki-nove-mirilo-ekonomichnogo-rostu.
31. Brussard, P. F., Reed, J. M., & Tracy, C. R. (1998). Ecosystem management: what is it really? Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(1-3), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00094-7.
32. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.
33. Gintis, H., & Helbing, D. (2015). Homo socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(1-2), 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000016.
How to Cite
PETRUSHENKO, M. M. (2020). “INCLUSIVE EXPERIENCE ECONOMY” – WELLNESS AND RECREATION: FROM PRODUCTION TO CONTEMPLATIVE NATURE MANAGEMENT. Economic Innovations, 22(2(75), 82-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.2(75).82-92