DESIGN OF EUROREGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM - "GROWTH POLE" OF PERIPHERAL ECONOMIC AREA


Keywords: innovations, integration, peripheral region, cross-border cluster system, competitiveness, cluster strategy

Abstract

Topicality. The topicality of the research is determined by the important role of innovative forms of cross- border cooperation in improving competitiveness of peripheral boundary regions, reducing of regional differentiation between cross border and internal regions, on one hand, and immaturity of theoretical and methodological aspects of studying the cross-border cooperation mechanisms, on the other. The reforming of the system controlling of the regional development involves the implementation of new quality of the regional strategy the aim of which is both to ensure the modernization of the country’s economy and to carry out complex and balanced development of peripheral (boundary) regions.
Aim and tasks. The aim of the article under consideration is to offer theoretical and methodological provisions and practical propositions to justify the improvement tools of project planning of the European regional innovative systems with Ukraine as a participant of cross-border cooperation under the conditions of EU enlargement by means of creating transnational cluster systems – network industrial integration institutions – which have become the poles of economical growth and competitiveness of peripheral economic area. The task is to work out the theoretical provisions and methodological principles of strategic planning to create and develop cross-border cluster systems in different sectors of economy taking into consideration their potential role as the systems that are able to fulfil purposes and to tackle problems with a focus on solving the task of modernization of Ukrainian peripheral regions’ economic system.
Research results. The objects of strategic planning are cross-border cluster systems looked upon as territorially located socially economic systems formed by a group of independent economic agents from the both sides of the border, by the organizations of bodies of executive power of the countries-actors of the European region and civil society. They consistently interact with each other by means of information, service, human and funds exchange and provide extra efficiency as compared with other, not systematically organized objects. Cross-border cluster systems can become the centers of regional development: investments promotion, diffusion of innovations, creation of human capital of new quality, standard of business relations, development of adequate institutions geared to address the task of the country’s economy modernization. For good reason, to raise the level of innovative economy of a peripheral region it is necessary to integrate educational and scientific infrastructure with power structures and with business environment to increase the layer of development on innovative enterprises. Universities should develop cooperation with the industry, use new approaches in academic research reflecting the needs of regional firms and assisting in strengthening their central role in EU regional innovative system development.
Conclusion. Formation of EU regional innovative system considerably transforms the priority of the main siting factors which changes the functions of periphery territory. The latter is transforming from physical basis – the material (resource) production factors siting – into the environment to develop human capital, innovations and providing self-development of EU region. The new postmodern reality includes postindustrial manufacturing together with network building of periphery economic area suggesting the transplantation of the institutions by means of self-organization of hybrid network clusters over the administrative boundaries which become the “growth poles”, factors of uniting and free circulation of funds in European regions. On the way towards the entry into the European Union it is necessary to generalize experience of cross-border cooperation as the previous and complementary phase of integration in regional terms. To form the complete and effective development policy of cross-border cooperation with the active participation of Ukrainian peripheral regions it is necessary to work out theoretical and methodological background of the quasi-integration of economic agents within the boundary of European regions and to justify new forms and mechanisms of its deepening with the benefit of cross-border cluster systems concept.

Author Biographies

O.I. LAIKO

Dr. Econ. Sciences, senior researcher
vice-director for scientific work of the Institute
Institute of market problems and economic&ecological research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Frantsuzkyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044

SERGIY I. KOVALENKO

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor

Danube Institute of National University “Odessa Maritime Academy”

9, Fanagoriyskaya str., Izmail, Ukraine

References

1. Declaration concerning regionalism in Europe/ Assembly of European Regions. - Strasbourg: Secretariat General Immobile Europe, 1996. - 10 p.
2. Cluster policy in Europe/ A brief summary of cluster policies in 31 European countries. – Europe Innovation Cluster Mapping Project. – Oxford Research AS, January 2008. – 34 р.
3. Marshall A. Elements of Economics of Industry Being the First Volume of Elements of Economics. L., 1928.
4. Porter M. The Competitiveness Advantage of Nations. - London: Macmillan, 1990.
5. Porter M. Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya / Per. s angl. - M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1993. - 896 s.
6. Porter, M. E. Clusters and the new economics of competition, in: Harvard Business Review, Nov./Dec., 1998, Vol. 76 Issue 6, p. 77.
7. Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. –New York: Free Press, 1985. – 450 p.
8. Coase R. G. Nature of the Firm [Text] / R.G. Coase // Lessons business organization. - St. Petersburg, Lenizdat, 1994 - C. 29.
9. Voinarenko M.P. Klastery yak poliusy zrostannia konkurentospromozhnosti rehioniv // Ekonomist. - №10. – 2008. – S. 27-30. [Clusters as poles of regional competitiveness growth // Economist. - №10. - 2008. - P. 27-30] [in Ukrainian].
10. Makogon Yu.V. Ekonomicheskie interesy Ukrainy v OChES / Yu.V. Makogon // Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya sotrudnichestva mezhdu stranami Yugo-Vostochnoi Evropy v ramkakh Chernomorskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva i GUAM: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. – Odessa-Donetsk: DonNU, 2008. – 966 s. [Makogon Yu.V. Economic interests of Ukraine in the BSEC / Yu.V. Makogon // Problems and prospects for the development of cooperation between the countries of Southeast Europe in the framework of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation and GUAM: a collection of scientific papers. - Odessa-Donetsk: DonNU, 2008 .- 966 p.]
11. Osypov V. M. Svitovyi dosvid stvorennia ta funktsionuvannia morskykh klasteriv / V. M. Osypov, O. A. Yermakova // Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen: zb. nauk. prats. - Odesa: ODEU, 2009. - №36. – S. 305-311. [Osipov V.M. World experience of creation and functioning of marine clusters / V.M. Osipov, O.A. Ermakova // Bulletin of socio-economic research: Coll. Sciences. wash. - Odessa: ODEU, 2009. - №36. - P. 305-311]. [in Ukrainian].
12. Filippova S.V. K voprosu formirovaniya morekhozyaistvennykh klasterov / S.V. Filippova, V.A. Saadzhan, V.D. Glushchenko //Ekonomіka: realії chasu. Naukovii zhurnal. - Odesa: 2014. - №5 (15),-S.146-151. [Filippova S.V. On the formation of marine economic clusters / S.V. Filippova, V.A. Saajan, V.D. Glushchenko // Economy: real hour. Science magazine. - Odessa: 2014 .- No. 5 (15), - S. 146-151].
13. Mikula N.A. Stratehiia formuvannia ta pidtrymky rozvytku transkordonnykh klasteriv /N.A.Mikula //Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy. Klastery ta konkurentospromozhnist prykordonnykh rehioniv: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vyp.3 (71) / NAN Ukrainy. In-t rehionalnykh doslidzhen; Redkol.: Vidp. red. Ye.I. Boiko. – Lviv, 2008. – S.129-141. [Mikula N.A. Strategy of formation and support of development of cross-border clusters / N.A. Mikula // Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine. Clusters and competitiveness of border regions: Collection of scientific papers. Issue 3 (71) / NAS of Ukraine. Institute of Regional Studies; Ed.: Ans. ed. E.I. Boyko. - Lviv, 2008. - P.129-141].
14. Porter, M. E. Locations, Clusters, and Company Strategy. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, & M. S. Gertler, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, 2000b, p. 253-274.
15. Porter, M. E. Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 2000, nr. 14 (1), p. 15-35.
16. Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local „Sticky“ and Global„'Ubiqutious“.
17. Trippl, M., Todling, F. and Lengauer, L. Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna software sector, Economic Geography, 85 (4), 2009, p. 443-462.
18. Perry F. Diffusion of Innovation and Regional Economic Growth.The Annals-Regional Science, 1998, V.5.
19. Wallerstein I. Analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world. St. Petersburg, 2001; Wallerstein I. The modern World-Systems. N.Y. 1984.
20. Winter S.G., Kaniovsky Y.M., Dosi G. Modeling Industrial Dynamics with Innovative Entrants // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. – 2000. – No.11. – pp. 255–293.
21. Becattini G. The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion // Pyke F, Becattini G, Sengenberger W (eds) Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies. Geneva. – 1990. – pp. 37-51.
22. Örjan Sölvell. Clusters – Balancing Evolutionary and Constructive Forces, 2-d ed. - Ivory Tower Publishers, Stockholm, 2009, pp. 24-29.
23. Fritsch, M. & Schwirten, C. Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems, Industry and Innovation 6, 1999, p. 69-83.
24. Kovalenko S.I. Self organization of innovation clusters as a basic modernization strategy for economy of trans-borders regions / S.I. Kovalenko // International Journal of Economics and Society. Volume 1, Issue 4, December, 2015, ICES Foundation. Memphis, USA, 2015. – C. 109-116.
25. Butenko, A.I., Lazareva, Ye.V. (2007). Investytsiin a diialnist v innovatsiinii sferi pidpryiemnytstva Ukrainy: metody i formy [Investment activity in the innovative sphere of enterprise of Ukraine : methods and forms]/ A.I. Butenko, Ye.V. Lazareva // Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy – Announcer of Economic Science of Ukraine. – 2007. – No2. – 14-19 [in Ukrainian].
26. Burkynskyi, B.V. (2001). Transformatsiia modelei rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Transformation of models of development of enterprise] / B.V. Burkynskyi. – Odesa, IPREED NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
27. Kovalenko S.I. Transkordonnyi klasterohenez yak protses mizhnarodnoi mezointehratsii u Dunaiskomu-Chernomorskomu baseini / S.I. Kovalenko // Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vypusk 1(69), Chastyna 1. Natsionalnyi aviatsiinyi universytet, Kyiv, 2019. – S. 43-52. [Kovalenko S.I. Transboundary clusterogenesis as a process of international mesointegration in the Danube-Black Sea basin / S.I. Kovalenko // Problems of systematic approach in economics. Collection of scientific works. Issue 1 (69), Part 1. National Aviation University, Kiev, 2019. - P. 43-52.], [in Ukrainian].
Published
2019-12-20
How to Cite
LAIKO, O., & KOVALENKO, S. I. (2019). DESIGN OF EUROREGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM - "GROWTH POLE" OF PERIPHERAL ECONOMIC AREA. Economic Innovations, 21(4(73), 94-112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2019.21.4(73).94-112