IMPROVING THE ENTERPRISES COMPETITIVENESS BY OPTIMIZING PRODUCTION COSTS


  • Y.K. Vasylkova
Keywords: competition, optimization of production costs, modernization of equipment, labor management, labor remuneration

Abstract

The technology of management decisions was studied in the article. The agricultural enterprises of Kherson region were analyzed. The modernization necessity of morally and physically obsolete fixed assets as an important component of compliance with rules and regulations protecting the environment was proved. The consequences of changes in legislatively established wage were analysis.
In the article there is given the analysis of the consequences of implementation of governmental bodies’ initiatives on the forming of tax burden when paying salary. It was discovered that increasing of nominal level of labour remuneration in general self cost of production may lead to increasing of selling price and worsening of competitive ratio in comparison with production (work, services) of foreign business entities. It was found that just internal changes in the structure of labour remuneration concerning the increase of a share of basic wage together with the simultaneous decrease of a share of additional wage and premium pays may almost equalize the wage levels of qualified specialists that have considerable intellectual potential and occur the positions of responsibility with the wage levels of unskilled service personnel.

Author Biography

Y.K. Vasylkova

6th year student of the Department of Enterprise Economics
Kherson State University
27, 40 rokiv Zhovtnya St., Kherson, Ukraine

References

1. Burkynskyi, B. V., & Molina, E. V. (2012). Konkurentosposobnoct produktsii i predpriyatiya. Odessa: IPREEI NAN [in Russian].
2. Burlyai, O. A., & Burlyai, A. P. (2009). Neobhidnist upravlinnya vytratamy na vyrobnytsvi produktsiyi roslynnytstva v ahgrarnykh pidpryyemstvakh. Ekonomika APK i pryrodokorystuvannya: visnyk KhNAU.13, 152-160 [in Ukraine]
3. Gerasimenko, Yu. S., & Leonov Ya. V. (2010). Systema upravlinnya vytratamy yak faktor pidvyshchennya konkurentospromozhnosti. Dnipropetrovsk. 1, 3, 175-183 [in Ukrainian].
4. Greshak, M. G., Gordiyenko, V. M., & Kotsyuba, O. S. (2008). Upravlinnya vytratami. K. [in Ukrainian].
5. Kontseba, S. M. (2010). Ekonomichna sutnist resursnogo zabezpechennya vyrobnytstva prodyktsiyi. Ekonomika APK. 7, 43-46 [in Ukrainian]
6. Marenych, T. G. (2010). Obyektyvna otsinka vytrat yak osnova vdoskonalennya upravlinnya ekonomikoyu. Visnyk KhNTUCG: ekonomichni nauky. Vol. 99, 3-16 [in Ukrainian]
7. Machulka, O. (2008). Oblik i analiz vytrat: upravlinskyi aspect. Buhgalterskyi oblik i audit. 10, 30-34 [in Ukrainian]
8. Okhrimenko, I. V. (2009). Vytraty ta sobivartist silskogospodarskoyi produktsiyi v regulyuvanni ekonomichnych vidnosyn silskogospodarskykh pidpryyemstv. K.: NNTs IAE [in Ukrainian]
9. Tyukhtenko, N. A., Makarenko, S. M., & Oliynyk N. M. (2016). Obyektyvizatsia vyznachennya kupivelnoyi spromozhnosti v umovakh tinovoyi ekonomiky. Visnyk Kyivskogo natsionalnogo universytetu imeni T. Shevchenka, Vol. 4, 181, 36-42 [in Ukrainian]
10. Sharapa, I. V., Makarenko, S. M., & Oliynyk N. M. (2011). Yakist zhyttya naselennya yak indicator sotsialno-ekonomichnogo rozvytku regiony. Tavriyskiy naukovyi visnyk, Vol. 77, 345-348 [in Ukrainian]
Published
2017-07-07
How to Cite
Vasylkova, Y. (2017). IMPROVING THE ENTERPRISES COMPETITIVENESS BY OPTIMIZING PRODUCTION COSTS. Economic Innovations, 19(2(64), 59-64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2017.19.2(64).59-64