Keywords: waste management, responsibility, environmental orientation, integration, resource-saving policy, conceptual approach.


Topicality. In recent years the waste management as an object of nature using economy and transdisciplinary scientific direction has become increasingly evolved both in applied and in the conceptual (theoretical and political) values. The negative situation with domestic and industrial wastes in Ukraine reflects world trends, in particular, in the groups of countries with only a developing economy. Garbage on the streets of large cities, increasing the number of unauthorized landfills, loss of valuable materials due to inefficient waste sorting and indifferent attitude to the idea of recycling – this list, unfortunately, can be continued further. Not only restraining factor to the aggravation of the environmental situation in the country caused by the placement of waste into the environment, there is a decline in production and poverty of the population. In such circumstances, given the fact that in the short and medium term, financial incentives to improve the situation look rather ghastly, it is advisable to turn to the review of the theoretical basis of their solution to the problem of waste. Moreover, it is necessary to find solutions at the conceptual level , in particular, by adapting to the present ukrainian economy the popular concept of an extended producer responsibility in the western countries and aspects of waste management in the framework of corporate social responsibility, etc.

Aim and tasks. Purpose of the article is justification of a conceptual approach to improving the waste management situation in a country with an unstable economy. Such an approach should be grounded on the position of responsible waste management in its economic and environmental dimensions. To do this, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between the main subjects of the “economy of waste”, and to compare the innovative conceptual approaches in waste management, united by ties with the concept of responsibility.
Research results. During the research, we found that economic responsibility, in that number in waste management, is the responsibility of the entity to be responsible for the commitments he has taken; in particular the compensation for losses which can be caused by it may be it to the property of other entities or the environment. According to Max Weber, the problem of responsibility is inextricably linked to the notion of ethics: "ethics of persuasion" and "ethics of responsibility"; the ethics of persuasion is related with the direction to perfection, and therefore the responsibility for practical actions is very weak. At the national level, significant changes are needed in environmental policy in terms of increasing responsibility for waste management (in particular packaging waste); it is based on the following principles: priority of environmental protection and human health, prevention of the formation of packaging waste, promotion of the development of a competitive market environment, separation of packaging waste collection and arrangement of places for their authorized harvesting, maximum use of waste packaging as a secondary raw material, the formation of ecological consciousness of the population and individual social groups and citizens, innovation and science in relation to the technical and technological and ecological and economic aspects of packaging waste management, a combination of effective incentives and regulatory policy in the field of packaging waste management, etc.
Conclusions. In the article it is determined that the conceptual principles of the waste problem research cover the theoretical basis (the position of the economy of nature management, the economy of waste, the economy of secondary resources) and the political component (environmental, social, regulatory policy – in those aspects that intersect with the formation and waste management) . As part of the analysis of the relationship between the waste problem and the concept of liability, attention is focused on such existing concepts: the concept of corporate social responsibility (in aspects of waste management), the concept of extended producer responsibility, the concept of integrated waste management. It is proposed to modify certain aspects of the concepts under study in order to form a new approach of “ecologically-expanded motivated producer responsibility”. This will allow for a comprehensive consideration of social and environmental factors in waste management in the medium-term perspective.

Author Biographies


Institute of Market Problems and Economic&Ecological Research of the

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

Frantsuzskyi boulevard, 29, Odesa, Ukraine, 65044


Director General of LLC «UMWELT Україна» (the REMONDIS group companies)
Lünen, Germany


1. Baitsar, R. I., & Depko, Kh. I. (2009). Normatyvno-pravove zabezpechennia sfery upravlinnia tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodamy [Regulatory and legal framework for solid waste management]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”, 639, 206-210 [in Ukrainian].
2. Bodog, M. (2009). The concept of waste management. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula: Protectia Mediului, XIV, 669-673.
3. Vyhovska, H. P. (2013). Kontseptualno-metodolohichni zasady minimizatsii vidkhodiv na bazi otsiniuvannia zhyttievoho tsyklu produktiv ta materialiv [Conceptual and methodological principles of waste minimization on the basis of evaluation of the life cycle of products and materials]. Ekolohichni nauky, 4, 114-125 [in Ukrainian].
4. Gorlitskiy, B. A. (2005). Ekologo-ekonomicheskaya optimizatsiya obrascheniya s othodami proizvodstva i potrebleniya v territorialno-administrativnyih obrazovaniyah raznogo masshtaba i profilya [Ecological and economic optimization of waste management of production and consumption in the territorial-administrative entities of different scale and profile]. Ekologiya i zdorove cheloveka. Ohrana vodnogo i vozdushnogo basseynov. Utilizatsiya othodov. In Sb. nauchn. trudov HIII mezhdunar. nauchno-tehnich. konf. – Harkov: UkrVODGEO, 623-630 [in Russian].
5. Keller, R. (2009). Müll – Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion des Wertvollen. Die öffentliche Diskussion über Abfall in Deutschland und rankreich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
6. Krykavskyi, Ye. V., Kostiuk, O. S., & Shandrivska, O. Ye. (2017). Vidpovidalne povodzhennia z tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodamy: paradyhmy ta kontraversii [Responsible management of solid waste, paradigms and controversies]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Lohistyka, 863, 101-110 [in Ukrainian].
7. Nöthe, M. (1999). Abfall: Behandlung, Management, Rechtsgrundlagen. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
8. Rylieiev, S. V. (2017). Klasyfikatsiia posluh shchodo povodzhennia z tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodamy v systemi oblikovo-analitychnoho zabezpechennia potreb upravlinnia [Classification of services for solid household waste management in the system of accounting and analytical maintenance of management needs]. Visnyk Chernivetskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho instytutu, IV(68), 147-158 [in Ukrainian].
9. Romanchuk, K. V., & Shymanska, K. V. (2015). Identyfikatsiia vidkhodiv yak obiekta bukhhalterskoho obliku ta kontroliu: klasyfikatsiinyi pidkhid [Identification of waste as an object of accounting and control: a classification approach]. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 1(31), 351-363 [in Ukrainian].
10. Savytska, K. V. (2015). Pidkhody do vyznachennia poniattia “vidkhody” z metoiu his-kartohrafuvannia [Approaches to the definition of “waste” for the purpose of gis-mapping]. Problemy bezperervnoi heohrafichnoi osvity i kartohrafii, 22, 121-124 [in Ukrainian].
11. Khomenko, I. O., Babachenko, L. V., & Padii, Ya. V. (2017). Problemy ta napriamy pererobky tverdykh pobutovykh vidkhodiv v Ukraini [Problems and directions of solid waste recycling in Ukraine]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 12, 454-458 [in Ukrainian].
12. Bayertz, K., & Beck, B. (2015). Soziale Verantwortung. Zur Entwicklung des Begriffs im 19. Und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Preprints and working papers of the centre for advanced study in bioethics. – Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, 81. Retreived from: normenbegruendung/intern/publikationen/bayertz/81_bayertz.beck_-_soziale_verantwortung.pdf.
13. Cetindamar, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: the case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of business ethics, 76, 163-176. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9265-4.
14. Gupt, Y., & Sahay, S. (2015). Review of extended producer responsibility: A case study approach. Waste Management & Research, 33(7), 595-611. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X15592275.
15. Zheng, X., Xu, F., & Feng, L. (2017). Analysis of driving factors for extended producer responsibility by using interpretative structure modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). Sustainability, 9(4), 540. DOI: 10.3390/su9040540.
16. Rayzberg, B. A., Lozovskiy, L. Sh., & Starodubtseva, E. B. (1999). Otvestvennost ekonomicheskaya / Sovremennyiy ekonomicheskiy slovar [Economic responsibility / Modern economic dictionary]. Moskva: INFRA-M [in Russian].
17. Seidel, W. (2009). Das ethische Gehirn. Der determinierte Wille und die eigene Verantwortung. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
18. Khumarova, N. I., & Martiienko, A. I. (2016). Derzhavne administratyvne upravlinnia pryrodokorystuvanniam v Ukraini [State administrative management of natural resources in Ukraine]. In Kontseptual'ni zasady ekonomichnoho zrostannia v umovakh hlobalizatsii, 286-300. Nurnberg, Germany: Verlag SWG imex GmbH Nurnberg [in Ukrainian].
19. Yoder, T. S. (2001). Corporate responsibility and the environment. Business and society review, 106:3, 255-272.
20. What a waste: a global review of solid waste management (2012). D. Hoornweg and P. Bhada-Tata, 15. Washington: Urban Development & Local Government Unit World Bank. Retreived from:
21. Zelena knyha “Rehuliuvannia rynku povodzhennia z tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodamy” [Green book “Regulation of the market for solid household waste management”] (2018). Edit. D. Horiunova, O. Honcharuk, I. Lavrynenko; Platforma efektyvnoho rehuliuvannia PRO Ministerstva ekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrainy. Kyiv: Ofis efektyvnoho rehuliuvannia (BRDO). Retreived from: [in Ukrainian].
22. Pro vidkhody: Zakon Ukrainy No. 187/98-VR vid 5 bereznia 1998 roku [On Waste: Law of Ukraine No. 187/98-VR of March 5, 1998] (1998). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 36-37, 242 [in Ukrainian].
23. Pro pryiednannia Ukrainy do Bazelskoi konventsii pro kontrol za transkordonnymy perevezenniamy nebezpechnykh vidkhodiv ta yikh vydalenniam: Zakon Ukrainy No. 804-XIV vid 1 lypnia 1999 roku [On Ukraine's Accession to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal: Law of Ukraine No. 804-XIV of July 1, 1999] (2009). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 34, 284 [in Ukrainian].
24. Dyrektyva 2006/12/IeS Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu ta Rady vid 5 kvitnia 2006 roku pro vidkhody [Directive 2006/12 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste] (2006). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu, L114, 9-21 [in Ukrainian].
25. Apresyan, R. G. (2001). Otvetstvennost / Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [Responsibility / New philosophical encyclopedia]. Edit. V. S. Stepina. Moskva: Myisl [in Russian].
26. Weber, Max (1919). Gesinnungsethik “versus” Verantwortungsethik / Politik als Beruf: Vortrag. Retreived from:
27. Proekt Zakonu Ukrainy pro upakovku ta vidkhody upakovky № 4028 vid 05.02.2016 [Draft Law of Ukraine on Packaging and Packaging Waste No. 4028 of 02.05.2016] (2016). Ofitsiinyi veb-portal Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. Retreived from: [in Ukrainian].